Environmental Ethics

Alison Rowland-April 10, 2007:
Today in class we discussed Ian Whyte’s article on elephant managment. The class discussed the pros and cons of a complete ban on elephant poaching. We talked of how elephants, in a Shmitz-like mindset, are very majestic creatures and superior to most creatures, i e rabbits. We talked of how elephants are very special and social creatures due to their characteristics and instinctual qualities. We talked of how Taylor would view elephant poaching and how it is adaquate to keep elephant populations at bay. Elephants deem destructive to the environment by uprooting trees and trudging along river banks; they are equivalent to the weight of vans and just as destructive. The Kruger National Park is a haven for many creatures in the heart of africa but increasing elephant populations raise questions regarding their affect on the environment.
Some solutions have been proposed such as translocation and birth control to downsize the birthrate. Whyte proposes that it must be in Africa’s self interest to keep elephants around. Some philosophers think there should be a monetary supplement to legally kill an elephant and that money should go towards conservation, others feel as though the killing should be justified and reluctant to the assasin.
I found an interesting website about the kruger national park. It provides insight and information into the reservation. The park itself monitors population growth among its creatures to keep populations at a healthy level. The website provides information about all of its animals and plants; and, It encourages people to visit and view such animals in their natural habitats.